<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Choose your framework</title>
	<atom:link href="http://miles-per-hour.com/2009/02/09/choose-your-framework/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://miles-per-hour.com/2009/02/09/choose-your-framework/</link>
	<description>programming at the speed of 1011000.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:23:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://miles-per-hour.com/2009/02/09/choose-your-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-11268</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mike-miles.com/blog/?p=119#comment-11268</guid>
		<description>I have just recently started using jQuery and have to say I love it.  I used script.aculo.us in the past, but nothing extremely extensive outside of their standard functions.  With jQuery I&#039;m creating much more efficient javascript through it&#039;s extremely easy syntax.  Along with its ease of use I&#039;m finding almost an endless amount of functionality and plug-ins built for its library.  Not to say the others don&#039;t have a plethera of options, but from other articles I&#039;ve read including this one, I&#039;d have to say jQuery is the one to use.  Or at least begin with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just recently started using jQuery and have to say I love it.  I used script.aculo.us in the past, but nothing extremely extensive outside of their standard functions.  With jQuery I&#8217;m creating much more efficient javascript through it&#8217;s extremely easy syntax.  Along with its ease of use I&#8217;m finding almost an endless amount of functionality and plug-ins built for its library.  Not to say the others don&#8217;t have a plethera of options, but from other articles I&#8217;ve read including this one, I&#8217;d have to say jQuery is the one to use.  Or at least begin with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
